Euro 2016 Qualifications
- Micky Quim
- PSA Chairman

- Posts: 9196
- Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:54 pm
- Location: Monte Darlo
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
Just cannot get excited about England playing
- LONDONTOON
- where so bias

- Posts: 3913
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:30 pm
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
Playing alright so far. Is ginger Pirlo on the bench
- LONDONTOON
- where so bias

- Posts: 3913
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:30 pm
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
As much as Hart is ovverated his distribution makes Kruls look like a females goalkeeper
- bodacious benny
- Scorecast Champ

- Posts: 39434
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:18 am
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
When was the last genuinely exciting England match?
I'm the scumbag outlaw. You're the pillar of justice. Neither of us like looking at ourselves in the mirror. Do we have a deal?
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
I would say Italy at the World Cup was a good game where England fought hard even if they ultimately lost, but it obviously depends on when you fell out of love with the national side. The last time I felt genuinely great about being an England fan was when we beat Germany 5-1, the last tournament I felt excited going into was the 2006 World Cup.Bodacious Benny wrote:When was the last genuinely exciting England match?
History wrought with disease for so long, a nation sleeps tight... the poison carries on!
this space reserved for particularly amusing quotes and/or images.
With friends like these, who needs herpes?
this space reserved for particularly amusing quotes and/or images.
With friends like these, who needs herpes?
- bodacious benny
- Scorecast Champ

- Posts: 39434
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:18 am
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
I wouldn't call the Italy match exciting. The 5-1 was probably it tbh.tomtom94 wrote:I would say Italy at the World Cup was a good game where England fought hard even if they ultimately lost, but it obviously depends on when you fell out of love with the national side. The last time I felt genuinely great about being an England fan was when we beat Germany 5-1, the last tournament I felt excited going into was the 2006 World Cup.Bodacious Benny wrote:When was the last genuinely exciting England match?
Welbeck 1-0.
I'm the scumbag outlaw. You're the pillar of justice. Neither of us like looking at ourselves in the mirror. Do we have a deal?
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
Shinned it.
"He's on the computer in his underwear wasting time in some chitchat room, going back & forth with some other fuckin' jerkoff"
Tony Soprano
-
overseasTOON
- Uruguay (Nunez)

- Posts: 22905
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:53 am
- Location: Location: Location
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
C'mon the mighty Luxembourg!!!
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
Welbeck should be starting ahead of Rooney.
- LONDONTOON
- where so bias

- Posts: 3913
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:30 pm
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
Wow. Well done Welbeck
2-0 Away to the cheese men, not bad England not bad
2-0 Away to the cheese men, not bad England not bad
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
You do realise they both started today right?Jaiston wrote:Welbeck should be starting ahead of Rooney.
Good start for England, hope we can qualify a bit more convincingly than we did last time.
History wrought with disease for so long, a nation sleeps tight... the poison carries on!
this space reserved for particularly amusing quotes and/or images.
With friends like these, who needs herpes?
this space reserved for particularly amusing quotes and/or images.
With friends like these, who needs herpes?
-
overseasTOON
- Uruguay (Nunez)

- Posts: 22905
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:53 am
- Location: Location: Location
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
I jinxed themoverseasTOON wrote:C'mon the mighty Luxembourg!!!
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
3-2 vs Sweden at Euro 2012Bodacious Benny wrote:When was the last genuinely exciting England match?
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
You do realise that only happened due to Sturridge being injured right?tomtom94 wrote:You do realise they both started today right?Jaiston wrote:Welbeck should be starting ahead of Rooney.
Good start for England, hope we can qualify a bit more convincingly than we did last time.
Thought it was obvious I was meaning Welbeck, Sturridge, Stirling ahead of Rooney, Sturridge, Stirling.
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
Ah, my mistake, I wondered if you thought he'd come on as a sub. You make a good point, though it's worth noting that Rooney was instrumental in Welbeck's first, made a driving run from midfield you wouldn't get in your first combination. A Welbeck/Sturridge pairing would be good at that final "cutting edge", but lose that link with the midfield.Jaiston wrote:You do realise that only happened due to Sturridge being injured right?tomtom94 wrote: You do realise they both started today right?
Good start for England, hope we can qualify a bit more convincingly than we did last time.
Thought it was obvious I was meaning Welbeck, Sturridge, Stirling ahead of Rooney, Sturridge, Stirling.
Good to see England have some competition for places again, at least. It'll go out the window the moment Rooney or Hart gets injured, but it's a nice thing to have at the moment.
History wrought with disease for so long, a nation sleeps tight... the poison carries on!
this space reserved for particularly amusing quotes and/or images.
With friends like these, who needs herpes?
this space reserved for particularly amusing quotes and/or images.
With friends like these, who needs herpes?
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
I'm not convinced you can play Welbeck and Sturridge, or at least not without massively marginalising one of them a la when we tried to play Ba and Cisse in a 4-3-3. They can both do the wing job, but both would prefer to play through the middle, and if another decent winger comes along to play opposite Sturridge (Chamberlain, Walcott if ever fit?) I'd say its one or the other. Rooney should be playing top of the midfield three.
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
They formed a good partnership when they played up top together for the U21s. That was part of a front 2 not a 4-3-3 though. Although with this midfield diamond we played tonight we had to up top so if we persist with that it shouldn't be a problem. Would mean dropping Rooney though.Colly wrote:I'm not convinced you can play Welbeck and Sturridge, or at least not without massively marginalising one of them a la when we tried to play Ba and Cisse in a 4-3-3. They can both do the wing job, but both would prefer to play through the middle, and if another decent winger comes along to play opposite Sturridge (Chamberlain, Walcott if ever fit?) I'd say its one or the other. Rooney should be playing top of the midfield three.
- Holystone...
- Grammer Police Chef

- Posts: 6697
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:38 am
- Location: Gosforth
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
..Heisen wrote:Quietly impressed with that, Switzerland are no mugs.
Agreed. Swiss were dogged and even could have nicked it.
Ashley tells you it's raining. Do you look out the window?
- LONDONTOON
- where so bias

- Posts: 3913
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:30 pm
Re: Euro 2016 Qualifications
Wow. Wales are awful













